![]() LeafSpy doesn't provide speed in the server logging, so I have to work it backwards from your lat/long position between this and the last data point. Tested with 2 different phones and two different ABRP accounts. Something other that needs to be considered? What I can see I have used exactly the settings in the instructions in the blog. It is only showed for 1s or so which makes it difficult to read. I sometimes sees a brief fault message in LeafSpy with “java error” or something and the address to ABRP server. And this weekend I didn’t get it to work at all. Last weekend when I tested I managed to get the upload working one time so that data in the drive mode was updated automatically, but after that it didn’t work. The reference consumption for our car is probably a little higher.īut in general I think it looks very good! Next step is maybe to get good data from LeafSpy uploads to improve the model?īut I have had issue with the LeafSpy upload. Our car will have less energy available with 5% degradation. The available energy in the model is maybe a little high still. Estimated arrival SOC quite close to the actual arrival SOC, impressive! So some small conclusions (however this short drive is probably not enough for making conclusions): So the consumption seems slightly higher in our car. The estimated SOC was quite close, however I had to manually reduce the actual estimated SOC a 1-2 percent after a while in the driving mode. So on the way home I tested the driving mode (without LeafSpy connection). However I am not sure if I was driving exactly the same speed as in the plan, probably the speed was little lower due to the margin added on the Leaf speedometer. The actual arrival SOC according to the car display was very close to what was estimated with ABRP, very impressive. ![]() The reference speed and max speed was set to best effort estimation. I checked the trip planning with ABRP using default reference consumption and battery degradation. The distance was 45 km and there were charging possibilities so we started with 100% charge both on the way there and back. However we used the car during the weekend to go to a shopping center. As the Leaf is my parent’s car I have limited possibilities to test, other people might have better feedback. Nice! Thanks! What I can see it looks quite good. ![]() ![]() I have increased the battery degradation the the ABRP settings to more than the default ~11% to compensate for this. Which actually more corresponds to the rate of which the % in the car drops while driving. Have not driven the car to very low SOC yet, but see ex link below (even though the person in the film seem a little confused about how Leaf Spy works). He had 3.8 kWh remaining when car resports 0% which would mean that the avalible energy from 100%->0% in the car would be ~34kWh. However all of that can not be used, and the car reports 0% even earlier. My parents Leaf is new (and shows ~99,8% SOH) and the avalible energy at full charge is ~37.9 kWh. What data are you using to build the consumption model? Avalible remaining energy, actual power or some of the SOC values? Is the provided data also used to calculate the avalible energy for the car model? Because that looks a little high for the Leaf 40 kWh? What I can see you are using ~37,8 kWh for 100%? That seems high I think. Nice! Yesterday I setup Leaf Spy and ABRP for my parents 40kWh Leaf so they could contribute some OBD data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |